Interoperability
Storage October 3, 2008 Standards, open standards and double standardsIn my last post I took Big Blue to task for its announcement that it intends to wage war against Microsoft in the world’s standards bodies. The motivation for this bellicose declaration was IBM’s stinging defeat last Spring in its battle to prevent the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) from ratifying Microsoft’s de facto office document standard (OOXML). IBM charges that Microsoft won at the ISO only because it packed the national standards organizations that make up the ISO membership with its pals. But the thing that galls me about IBM’s position – and the reason I wrote my post – is not its goody-two-shoes stance about lobbying. No, it’s the flagrant hypocrisy behind this whole open standards campaign. In a nutshell, Big Blue conspicuously fails to practice what it preaches. Click to read more...
More articles by Jeff Gould, CEO & Director of Research, Peerstone Research |
SPONSORED |


Want to host a Solution Center on Interop News?
For more information, Click Here.
February 1, 2008 By Mario Apicella (InfoWorld)
A new set of storage specs takes a timid first step toward compatible components -- but is not likely to go far enough.
Getting storage vendors to play together nicely is no easy task. When they do, it is an event worthy of pause -- even if the gathering proves more about self-service than boosting the interoperability of their wares.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/02/01/05OP-storinside-storage-specs-interoperability_1.html
Reader Comments