Operating Systems
Google October 3, 2008 Standards, open standards and double standardsIn my last post I took Big Blue to task for its announcement that it intends to wage war against Microsoft in the world’s standards bodies. The motivation for this bellicose declaration was IBM’s stinging defeat last Spring in its battle to prevent the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) from ratifying Microsoft’s de facto office document standard (OOXML). IBM charges that Microsoft won at the ISO only because it packed the national standards organizations that make up the ISO membership with its pals. But the thing that galls me about IBM’s position – and the reason I wrote my post – is not its goody-two-shoes stance about lobbying. No, it’s the flagrant hypocrisy behind this whole open standards campaign. In a nutshell, Big Blue conspicuously fails to practice what it preaches. Click to read more...
More articles by Jeff Gould, CEO & Director of Research, Peerstone Research |
SPONSORED |


Want to host a Solution Center on Interop News?
For more information, Click Here.
|
INTEROP NEWSLINE |
September 24, 2008 By Joab Jackson (GCN)
When Google released its browser earlier this month, the IT pundits rushed to call it a potential replacement of the operating system.
So we're glad that Ojan Vafai, a software engineer for the Google Chrome browser, did his best to set the record straight at a session on the future of browsers at the O'Reilly Web 2.0 Expo in New York last week.
"It's not even clear what it means to replace the operating system with the browser. It's [an] apples and oranges [scenario] frankly, to compare an operating system [with] a Web browser," Vafai said, responding to a question of whether browsers would one day replace operating systems.
June 2, 2008 By Gary Flood (ZDNet.co.uk)
What is the state of play when it comes to the development and management of server operating systems, and how is the landscape likely to change in the future?
Operating Systems
October 17, 2007 By Andrew Conry-Murray (InformationWeek)
As VMware pushes the hypervisor to supplant the operating system, Microsoft is stuck playing catch-up.
Usually the bully kicks sand in the little guy's face, but VMware is switching that story. In a speech at LinuxWorld in August, VMware chief scientist Mendel Rosenblum talked up application-specific operating systems provided by ISVs that would run on a hypervisor--no general-purpose OS needed. You can bet Microsoft took notice.
May 19, 2007 By Peter Galli (eWeek) May 17, 2007
Some of the changes in the upcoming release of Windows Server 2008 are a response to features and performance advantages that have made Linux an attractive option to Microsoft customers.
One of these is the fact that Linux has less of a surface area, which led customers to believe that Linux is inherently more secure, Bill Laing, the general manager for Microsoft's Windows Server division, told eWEEK in an interview at its annual Windows Hardware Engineering conference here.
February 2, 2007 By Michael Swaine (Dr. Dobbs) February 02, 2007
If one were to try, as technology writers are wont to do, to characterize the state of operating systems at this approximate midpoint in the first century of OS history, one phrase that might spring to mind is existential angst. Or maybe identity crisis. I mean, consider:
On the one hand, we are confronted with splashy operating systems news heralding new OS generations and directions and features, from the long-awaited release of Microsoft's Windows Vista and the new twists in Apple's Mac OS X to the peculiar maneuvers of Microsoft and Oracle regarding Linux—which, if nothing else, state loud and clear that Linux is an operating system force to be reckoned with.
Operating Systems