Jeff Gould
October 3, 2008

Standards, open standards and double standards

In my last post I took Big Blue to task for its announcement that it intends to wage war against Microsoft in the world’s standards bodies. The motivation for this bellicose declaration was IBM’s stinging defeat last Spring in its battle to prevent the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) from ratifying Microsoft’s de facto office document standard (OOXML).

IBM charges that Microsoft won at the ISO only because it packed the national standards organizations that make up the ISO membership with its pals.

But the thing that galls me about IBM’s position – and the reason I wrote my post – is not its goody-two-shoes stance about lobbying. No, it’s the flagrant hypocrisy behind this whole open standards campaign. In a nutshell, Big Blue conspicuously fails to practice what it preaches.

Click to read more...

More articles by Jeff Gould, CEO & Director of Research, Peerstone Research

Search

Want to host a Solution Center on Interop News?
For more information, Click Here.

INTEROP NEWSLINE

Entries in MySQL (10)

Tuesday
03Jun

MySQL gives .NET high five

By John K. Waters (RedDevNews)
There was a lot of head scratching at this year's MySQL Conference and Expo when Microsoft was singled out for its contributions to open source development.
"Seriously?" one attendee was overheard asking during the keynote address of Marten Mickos, who was CEO of MySQL AB until Sun Microsystems Inc. acquired the open source database developer for $1 billion in March. Mickos, who's now senior VP in Sun's new database group, pointed to Redmond's work with MySQL in naming Microsoft one of three companies to receive its Partner of the Year awards.

Click to read more ...


Wednesday
07May

It's official: The future of Sun/MySQL is open...and closed

By Matt Asay (CNET Blogs)
The Sun faithful who attended the CommunityOne Conference this morning may not have noticed, but Sun and its MySQL executives were very clear about Sun's open-source strategy going forward, despite news reports that seem to have missed the nuances:
The core will always be 100 percent open source. The periphery...will not. Or might not. It depends.

Click to read more ...


Friday
18Apr

Review: What Sun hath wrought for MySQL

By Fahmida Y. Rashid, (ChannelWeb)
The most well-known open source database for Web applications now has a strong channel program backing it, new features, and a slew of new management features.
At the MySQL User Conference this week, Sun unveiled new features for the database, with a little caveat: The new features, including online backup, encryption, and native storage engine-specific drivers, will be available only for its enterprise subscription customers.

Click to read more ...


Wednesday
16Apr

Sun Microsystems has announced a 'near-final' release candidate of MySQL 5.1

By Clement James (vnunet.com)
Sun Microsystems has announced the general availability of MySQL 5.1, the latest version of its popular open source database.
A 'near-final' release candidate of the GPL software is available for download now.
MySQL 5.1 features enhancements including table and index partitioning, which allows faster query response times as only the relevant partitions of data need to be scanned instead of the entire table or index.

Click to read more ...


Thursday
31Jan

Sun`s best buy ever: MySQL

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols (eWeek)
Some people can't believe Sun actually spent a billion dollars for MySQL; I can't believe they got such a great deal.

Click to read more ...


Thursday
31Jan

Open source valuations, competition, downloads, and profitability

By Mark Hinkle (Linux Today)
And on goes my fascination with open source companies and their valuations...
I was reading Stephen O'Grady's commentary on open source companies and their valuations prompted by the recent acquisition of MySQL by Sun for $1 billion. He quotes Jeff Gould who logically questions whether Sun can make the acquisition pay-off.
Stephen also quotes a piece from Knowledge@Wharton on the myth of market share.

Click to read more ...


Wednesday
30Jan

Is MySQL's fate the future of open source?

By Glyn Moody (Linux Journal) 
It's not every day that the entire technical press goes bonkers over news in the open source world, but that's what happened last week, when Sun announced that it was buying MySQ  ...Sun's move does raise a larger question about the fate of all open source start-ups.

Click to read more ...


Tuesday
29Jan

Is the open source IPO a pipe dream?

By Paula Rooney (ZDNet Blogs)
Will Red Hat be the only major pure play open source company to go public?
That’s what observers are wondering as more and more open source stars are swallowed up by traditional proprietary giants, with Nokia’s purchase of Trolltech – announced yesterday - and Sun’s buy of MySQL earlier this month being the most recent. IBM, Oracle, Citrix and Novell have also made big open source acquisitions over the past five years.

Click to read more ...


Friday
25Jan

Making MySQL pay: A question of core and complements

By Matt Asay (CNET Blogs)
Jeff Gould has written an excellent piece on the big question arising from Sun's acquisition of MySQL: how will Sun make enough money on the deal to justify the $1 billion valuation? Gould's analysis is generally solid, but he misses a few key points.

Click to read more ...


Thursday
24Jan

Will Sun cast a shadow on other database platforms?

By Jeffrey Schwartz (Redmond Developer) 
It's rather ironic, but Sun's surprise move last week to acquire database supplier MySQL for $1 billion could actually give the open source DBMS a boost in the market, while at the same time bolstering SQL Server.
Following the announcement, I had a chance to talk with Gartner analyst Donald Feinberg, who had some poignant thoughts on the deal. The way he sees it, the deal probably hurts Oracle the most, since Sun has focused much of its database efforts on Oracle and it is the Oracle customer base most likely -- for pricing reasons -- to be looking to other database platforms.

Click to read more ...