Jeff Gould
October 3, 2008

Standards, open standards and double standards

In my last post I took Big Blue to task for its announcement that it intends to wage war against Microsoft in the world’s standards bodies. The motivation for this bellicose declaration was IBM’s stinging defeat last Spring in its battle to prevent the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) from ratifying Microsoft’s de facto office document standard (OOXML).

IBM charges that Microsoft won at the ISO only because it packed the national standards organizations that make up the ISO membership with its pals.

But the thing that galls me about IBM’s position – and the reason I wrote my post – is not its goody-two-shoes stance about lobbying. No, it’s the flagrant hypocrisy behind this whole open standards campaign. In a nutshell, Big Blue conspicuously fails to practice what it preaches.

Click to read more...

More articles by Jeff Gould, CEO & Director of Research, Peerstone Research

Search

Want to host a Solution Center on Interop News?
For more information, Click Here.

INTEROP NEWSLINE

Entries in Intellectual Property (44)

Wednesday
24Sep

Antitrust status conference on tap for Microsoft

By Dawn Kawamoto (CNET News)
Microsoft and antitrust regulators will be back in federal court on Thursday, for a regularly scheduled status conference on the software giant's compliance with the final judgment order stemming from its historic consent decree.
In preparation for the upcoming hearing, which will be held in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., Microsoft, the Department of Justice, and state antitrust regulators filed a joint status report late last week.

Click to read more...


Tuesday
16Sep

Appcelerator switches from GPL to Apache to boost adoption

By Matt Asay (CNET Blogs)
We've seen a groundswell of support for the GNU General Public License (GPL) and its variants among commercial open-source companies, including MySQL, Funambol, Alfresco, SugarCRM, and others. But Appcelerator is bucking the trend and changing from the GPL to the Apache Public License for its Rich Internet Application developer tools.

Click to read more...


Tuesday
02Sep

A new battle is beginning in branding for the Web

By Steve Lohr (New York Times)
To marketers large and small, the Web is a wide open frontier, an unlimited billboard with boundless branding opportunities.
For the empirical proof, look at the filings with the government for new trademarks that, put simply, are brand names.

Click to read more...


Friday
15Aug

Judge: Even 'free' open-source code is licensed

By Chloe Albanesius (PCMag.com)
The open source community – and tech-savvy model railroad enthusiasts – were handed a victory Wednesday when an appeals court ruled that people who use open source content can be found guilty of copyright infringement if they do not adhere to the license terms set out by the creator.

Click to read more...


Tuesday
12Aug

Is MS-DWSS the POP3 for collaborative workspaces?

By Larry Cannell (Burton Group)
This is the last in a series of blog posts where I discuss what Alfresco's support of SharePoint protocols means and what can happen now that Microsoft has released technical documentation of their Office and Windows protocols. The first post is entitled "Cloning SharePoint" and the second post is "What the heck is a SharePoint Protocol?"
Alfresco Labs 3 is a thought provoking example of a type of solution that can be created now that Microsoft has released this protocol information.

Click to read more...


Monday
28Jul

Microsoft extends and clarifies the OSP

By Mike Gunderloy (Ostatic)
Microsoft has made it clear (in part through this posting from Associate General Counsel Richard Wilder) that a software product doesn't have to implement an entire specification perfectly to fall under the OSP. That's welcome news to developers who were worried that a bug or missing feature could result in them inadvertently being subject to legal action.

Click to read more...


Thursday
03Jul

IBM mainframe acquisition raises antitrust concerns

By Grant Gross (CIO)
IBM has acquired Platform Solutions, a vendor of mainframes and other computer hardware, in a move that raised antitrust concerns from one IT trade group.
IBM's acquisition of Platform Solutions, announced Wednesday, ends lawsuits the two companies had filed against each other. In November 2006, IBM filed a lawsuit against Platform Solutions (PSI), accusing the Sunnyvale, California, company of patent infringement by creating computers that allow customers to run IBM's System z operating systems and software on mainframes from other vendors.

Click to read more ...


Wednesday
02Jul

The Commission's incoherent approach to IP imperils Europe's economic future

By Joff Wild (IAM Magazine)
Whenever you speak to someone from the European Commission about intellectual property and ask them whether the various directorate-generals that have an interest in the area get together and talk issues through, you are always told yes. I have been assured on a number of occasions that there are regular meetings between representatives of the different DGs on IP and that everyone agrees on everything IP-related that the European Commission says or does. All of which makes you wonder whether any of them really have any clue about the extraordinary mixed messages that come out of Brussels on what seems like a regular basis.

Click to read more ...


Tuesday
01Jul

T3 Technologies ready to lodge complaint with EU over IBM conduct - source

Thompson Financial (CNBC)
T3 Technologies Inc. is ready to lodge a formal antitrust complaint with the European Commission against U.S. technology company IBM over alleged anti-competitive behaviour in the European computer mainframe market, a source close to the matter said.
T3 Technologies believes that IBM, as the number one mainframe vendor, has shut out it and other rivals from sales in the market by closing support for older mainframe systems and not licensing its mainframe software to rivals.

Click to read more ...


Friday
09May

The curse of open source license proliferation

By Mark Hinkle (Socialized Software)
I remember when the big open source debate was whether a piece of software was really open source, meaning it was released under an OSI-approved license. The tides are shifting, debates now center around which open source license to use. Adding to the complexity of the debate is proliferation of OSI-approved licenses.

Click to read more ...